Re: Peoples Thoughts About The IAM



In article <1133117450.132290.90700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Peter" <petermcmillan_uk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Mark Foster wrote:
> > In article <1133111449.014561.305030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > "Peter" <petermcmillan_uk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Mark Foster wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Which is why it is such a shame that the standard of membership is in
> > > > such decline. You are a perfect example.
> > >
> > > lol, you have never even seen me drive.
> >
> > Your posts are a good indication of your abilities and understanding, or
> > rather lack of.
> >
> > > I think your opinion of the average driver is far too high.
> >
> > Hah! Not quite.
> >
> > > Surely you
> > > can agree that to pass the IAM test you've got to be within the top 10%
> > > of drivers?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > > The average driver is rubbish!
> >
> > I've never said any different.
> >
> > > I have been supprised by a few things though. If my IAM test was a
> > > 'normal' test I'm pretty sure that I would have failed. Surely the
> > > 'normal' test should be a benchmark for driving standards though? I'm
> > > pretty sure that things such as taking the line of least resistance on
> > > a roundabout would result in you being marked down on a normal test.
> > > I'm starting to have doubts about how I should drive, should I do what
> > > would pass a normal driving test, or what would pass an advanced
> > > driving test?
> >
> > Thank you. That is a perfect example of your complete and utter lack of
> > understanding of The System and Roadcraft in general and is all the
> > evidence that is needed as to why you should not have passed let alone
> > be allowed to teach others.
>
> Ok, would you please explain this to me.
>
> I didn't even mention road craft, so I don't know how you made
> conclusions about that.

You don't have to mention it to show that you don't understand it.

> I was talking about what is in the tests.

Yes, and you are clearly confused as to "what is the right thing to do"
thereby indicating a total lack of understanding in a subject that you
profess to competent enough to teach.

> You've really got me confused

It would appear that's not very hard.

> I'm not even going to say anymore until I understand what you're
> talking about.

Is that a promise?

--
Mark Foster, Brighton, Sussex, UK
E-mail: m.e.fosterREMOVEMEFIRST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 3342 C02C 7BE8 3FE4 AAC5 8BB2 03B7 9263 DDF2 04C1
--------------------------------------------------
"There are no such useless words as...'I didn't have a chance.'"
[Driving, HMSO]
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Peoples Thoughts About The IAM
    ... >> Mark Foster wrote: ... >>> Which is why it is such a shame that the standard of membership is in ... >> I think your opinion of the average driver is far too high. ... >> would pass a normal driving test, or what would pass an advanced ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Silent Failure
    ... Not understanding the non-understandable is not an indication of dullness. ... I know the Windows 2000 Scripting Guide says ... courtesy software does not overwrite ...
    (microsoft.public.scripting.wsh)
  • Re: This Morning
    ... Mark Foster gurgled happily, ... sounding much like they were saying: ... There is no indication that he was asked to show his documents in the ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Are Sexual Offense Laws Too Harsh? And Do They Work?
    ... Your understanding is as inaccurate as your awareness. ... it's a far better indication of low self-esteem than ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Definition of Mathematics and Above
    ... above makes sense as even an indication of rigorous mathematics, ... If there is a single human being other than MoeBlee who believes that ... thesis as being gibberish at the first lack of understanding. ...
    (sci.logic)