Re: Nuts nicked at 170mph

Alistair J Murray wrote:
> Adrian wrote:
>> Craig Davies (c.j.davies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) gurgled happily, sounding
>> much like they were saying :
>
> [...]
>
>>> The men - from London and aged in their 20s or early 30s - were
>>> charged with dangerous driving.
>>
>> I suspect that the charge arises more from the manner of the driving
>> than the speed.
>
> Indeedy.
>
> The Germans have no problem with 170mph as such.

I wouldn't know, never been at >160 in germany...


--
re-configure the solar matrix in parallel for endothermic propulsion


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nuts nicked at 170mph
    ... > like they were saying: ... >> charged with dangerous driving. ... > I suspect that the charge arises more from the manner of the driving than ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: hands free
    ... they were saying: ... considered for a charge of dangerous driving or worse as it seems while ... hands free is "legal" its also considered dangerous if it results in ... Dangerous driving is explicitly banned, ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Garrison Keillor on Enemy Combatants
    ... What I am saying, is that neither Gitmo, nor the Iraq War are ... drive out personal freedom and liberty? ... Simply whining and carping isn't criticism; ... grown-ups and adults have won and remain in charge, ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: bank charges
    ... or whether they are saying "You are not allowed to exceed ... your agreed limit - if you do so we will charge you £x" ... of contract if you do, and the resulting charge will be £x. ... not about whether the contract wording matters. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Why Are Charges Based on Random Outcome?
    ... shooting at "people" would yield the charge of "shooting at ... And it's not like drunk driving that doesn't ... That's not what we're saying. ... it's not a "completely random outcome" that someone may be ...
    (misc.legal)