Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- From: Mark Foster <m.e.fosterREMOVEMEFIRST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:16:36 +0100
In article <1122455534.894357.154460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
conkersack@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> ...however, the ToE, like any scientific theory, can be tested.
>
> > I don't see how that is possible.
>
> Which only really serves to underline your ignorance of scientific
> procedure.
That sentence was three words too long.
--
Mark Foster, Brighton, Sussex, UK
E-mail: m.e.fosterREMOVEMEFIRST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 3342 C02C 7BE8 3FE4 AAC5 8BB2 03B7 9263 DDF2 04C1
--------------------------------------------------
"There are no such useless words as, 'I didn't have a chance.'"
[Driving, HMSO]
.
- References:
- Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- From: Silk
- Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- From: Alistair J Murray
- Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- From: Silk
- Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- From: Alistair J Murray
- Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- From: Silk
- Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- From: conkersack
- Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- Prev by Date: Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- Next by Date: Re: Traffic Master false positives (and good personalised plate)
- Previous by thread: Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- Next by thread: Re: The fish (darwin?) symbol...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|