Re: Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- From: "Graham Harrison" <edward.harrison1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:54:11 -0000
"Rob Morley" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:20110225182233.3780cbef@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:15:36 -0000
"Graham Harrison" <edward.harrison1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The fact that driving without lights is legal doesn't necessarily
mean it is safe in my view.
But you said you can see them - surely if you can see them, and they
presumably can see where they're going, then it's safe?
Yes, but I can see the ones that do have their lights on better. All very subjective. I've never made any attempt to compare the available light on days when a lit car approaches versus an unlit car but it's a personal opinion.
.
- References:
- Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- From: Derek C
- Re: Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- From: Graham Harrison
- Re: Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- From: Rob Morley
- Re: Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- From: Graham Harrison
- Re: Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- From: Rob Morley
- Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- Prev by Date: Re: Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- Next by Date: Re: Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- Previous by thread: Re: Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- Next by thread: Re: Another brave/foolish cyclist!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|