Re: Oxford St.Cyclist V. cabbie in court, the final result
- From: "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 01:09:04 +0100
Phil W Lee wrote:
I doubt it - I suspect that the missing "witness" was simply not
prepared to perjure himself on his colleagues behalf.
The list of offences with which the perjurous cabbie can now be
charged should be sufficient to end his cab driving career for good,
and hopefully remove the risk he presents to the public entirely for a
reasonable time.
There's perjury of course, but as he attempted to collude with another
cabbie, that means conspiracy to pervert the course of justice as
well.
Then there's the original offences of dangerous driving, failure to
give insurance details to his victim, attempted murder (or at the very
least GBH), and I'm sure a few more.
The CPS should be at least as enthusiastic about pursuing these
charges as they were about the trumped up original ones.
Ze Plane! Ze Plane!
FFS you live in a world of your own.
--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike, like a skateboard, is
a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.
.
- References:
- Oxford St.Cyclist V. cabbie in court, the final result
- From: Mrcheerful
- Re: Oxford St.Cyclist V. cabbie in court, the final result
- From: JNugent
- Re: Oxford St.Cyclist V. cabbie in court, the final result
- From: Squashme
- Re: Oxford St.Cyclist V. cabbie in court, the final result
- From: Mrcheerful
- Oxford St.Cyclist V. cabbie in court, the final result
- Prev by Date: Re: Oxford St.Cyclist V. cabbie in court, the final result
- Next by Date: Re: School bicycle shed crammed with bikes.
- Previous by thread: Re: Oxford St.Cyclist V. cabbie in court, the final result
- Next by thread: More Oxford Street news
- Index(es):