Re: Electric bikes?
- From: Ben C <spamspam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:38:49 -0500
On 2009-09-09, Brendan Halpin <brendan.halpin@xxxxx> wrote:
[...]
A 20kg electric bike[1] should surely do an order of magnitude less than
a 1.5 tonne car, though it will probably require some food-based energy
input from the rider too.
Yes, just think of the power. A car has about 100bhp which is around
75kW. A reasonably fit bicycle rider puts out only 0.15kW.
So although the engine in most cars is actually slightly more efficient
than the human body at converting chemicals into energy, it's consuming
energy at about 500 times the rate.
Of course the reason the car needs all that power is because it's so
massive, as you say. We also need them to go fast.
[...]
[1] I also wonder why it wouldn't be much more efficient to have little
petrol motors -- how much loss is there in using fossil fuels to
generate electricity, transmit it, charge it into a battery with it and
then let it out again?
Yes petrol motors are quite efficient, and you can have a huge range
from a small fuel tank, but they don't scale well down to such low
powers, so, as you say, you might need a battery to store energy and
then run the engine intermittently.
Or you can have a "pulse and glide" engine-- a 500cc 1 cylinder engine
but that only does 1rpm or so. I think this is more efficient than a
miniature 1cc engine running at 3000rpm (although that would be cute).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electric bikes?
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: Electric bikes?
- From: Ian
- Re: Electric bikes?
- References:
- Electric bikes?
- From: Doug
- Re: Electric bikes?
- From: Andreas Schulze Bäing
- Re: Electric bikes?
- From: James
- Re: Electric bikes?
- From: Mike Clark
- Re: Electric bikes?
- From: Brendan Halpin
- Electric bikes?
- Prev by Date: Re: Electric bikes?
- Next by Date: Re: Electric bikes?
- Previous by thread: Re: Electric bikes?
- Next by thread: Re: Electric bikes?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|