Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: Keitht <KeithT>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:55:10 +0100
JNugent wrote:
Wm... wrote:Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:12:08 <-qmdnUnICb2UkATXnZ2dnUVZ8nVi4p2d@xxxxxxxxx> uk.rec.cycling JNugent <JN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
That doesn't make it any less of a traffic offence and any less wrong and totally immoral.
Totally immoral? How old are you?
Causing unnecessary - but quite deliberate - disadvantage without lawful excuse to others is immoral.
The practice described is a form of unlawful detention. I'm shocked that you can'r immediately see that without having it spelled out.
'Unlawful' implies there is a law that has been broken.
'immoral' is a personal preference, not a national thang.
Which is it to be?
--
Come to Dave & Boris - your cycle security experts.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mess
- From: Ian
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: Judith M Smith
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: JNugent
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mess
- References:
- Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: Tom Crispin
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: Doug
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: JNugent
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: Doug
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: JNugent
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: Wm...
- Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- From: JNugent
- Tonight's Critical Mass
- Prev by Date: Re: Peloton
- Next by Date: Re: Belt versus chain
- Previous by thread: Re: Tonight's Critical Mess
- Next by thread: Re: Tonight's Critical Mass
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|