Re: Cambridge spelling gaffe.
- From: spindrift <newtyres@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
On 13 June, 13:22, n...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
In article <4ICdnTGlMdbNBK7XnZ2dnUVZ8rqdn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Simon Mason <si...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I wonder how many people with letters after their name who peer review
documents walked past this sign?
Unless it was seriously hidden, lots :-) I didn't notice it. Does
anyone know where it was (is)?
Some poor maintenance bod wrote the sign, it's nothing to do with
university teaching staff or peer-review.
I don't criticise safespeed because none of their crap is peer-
I criticise it because it's barking mad bum gravy.
For instance, the dead smith claimed checking your speedo is
He 'proved' this by sitting in his garage with a stopwatch and timing
how long it took to glance down.
Or ther'e his encouragement of perverting justice and using dead
people to avoid speeding fines.
Or his support for the death threats made to Mary Williams on
Or his dishonesty in labelling himself an 'engineer' when he was
really a computer salesman.
Or his supporters on the safespeeding forum saying that companies who
make speed cameras deserve being sent letter bombs- you can still find
that on the safespeeding forums, search on 'companies- deserving'.
Or his misrepresentation of Joksch's work which resulted in Joksch
demanding that smith cease and desist.
That smith's lies and distortions find an eager and willing audience
in nuxxy says it all.