Re: Charged for being knocked off his bike
- From: "Geoff Pearson" <gspearson1647@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:32:59 -0000
"wafflycat" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message
news:ZvCdnU3UaImykSHanZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d@xxxxxxxxx
See
http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/News/story.aspx?brand=ENOnline&category=News&tBrand=enonline&tCategory=news&itemid=NOED20%20Feb%202008%2011%3A08%3A24%3A713
or
http://tinyurl.com/2a2tvh
or
http://preview.tinyurl.com/2a2tvh
Includes:-
"Commenting on the case, legal expert Brian Jarvis, a solicitor from city
firm Overburys, said: ?This sort of claim is quite unusual in my
experience. If Mr Clarke started to cross when the amber light was
flashing then he was taking a risk, but that doesn't mean the motorist can
set off as soon as the lights start flashing - they can only do that if
no-one is crossing. In this case I think the motorist and cyclist would
share some blame but that the majority of it would lie with the motorist.?"
I rather presume my household insurance would cover this but has that been
tested?
.
- References:
- Charged for being knocked off his bike
- From: wafflycat
- Charged for being knocked off his bike
- Prev by Date: Re: What happened to Sunday?
- Next by Date: Re: Charged for being knocked off his bike
- Previous by thread: Re: Charged for being knocked off his bike
- Next by thread: Re: Charged for being knocked off his bike
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|