Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Tim Hall <timhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:47:10 +0100
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:04:35 +0100, "Nigel Cliffe" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dylan Smith wrote:
On 2007-10-11, Al C-F
<aloysius_cholmondeley_featherstonehawe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My workplace provides business use cover for our private carsThat's a remarkably good rate. I trust you tell the tax man.
(including reimbursing us at 50p a mile).
It's an expense, and is not taxable. (Actaully, our employer I think
reports this anyway, but it's certainly not taxable). It might not
look so remarkably good when you realise that the cheapest unleaded
here last
time I filled up was 105p/litre - and most journeys made for business
purposes are likely to be short (i.e. the highest wear and tear on the
vehicle, as well as having the worst fuel economy).
Oh dear, assuming you are in the UK and paying UK taxes...
I believe Dylan is a Manxman.
--
Tim
fast and gripping, non pompous, glossy and credible.
.
- References:
- The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Mike the unimaginative
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Piers Kittel
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Paul Boyd
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Piers Kittel
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: burtthebike
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Dylan Smith
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Al C-F
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Dylan Smith
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Nigel Cliffe
- The Wrong Type of Insult!
- Prev by Date: Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- Next by Date: Re: Sterling House - here we go again!
- Previous by thread: Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- Next by thread: Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|