Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Dylan Smith <dylan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:08:43 +0000 (UTC)
On 2007-10-11, Al C-F <aloysius_cholmondeley_featherstonehawe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My workplace provides business use cover for our private cars (includingThat's a remarkably good rate. I trust you tell the tax man.
reimbursing us at 50p a mile).
It's an expense, and is not taxable. (Actaully, our employer I think
reports this anyway, but it's certainly not taxable). It might not look so
remarkably good when you realise that the cheapest unleaded here last
time I filled up was 105p/litre - and most journeys made for business
purposes are likely to be short (i.e. the highest wear and tear on the
vehicle, as well as having the worst fuel economy).
--
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: JNugent
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Nigel Cliffe
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: David Lloyd
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- References:
- The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Mike the unimaginative
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Piers Kittel
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Paul Boyd
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Piers Kittel
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: burtthebike
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Dylan Smith
- Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- From: Al C-F
- The Wrong Type of Insult!
- Prev by Date: Re: The antidote
- Next by Date: Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- Previous by thread: Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- Next by thread: Re: The Wrong Type of Insult!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|