Re: CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- From: David Damerell <damerell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2007 16:39:04 +0100 (BST)
Quoting Peter Clinch <p.j.clinch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Ian Jackson wrote:
It's not clear what that's based on besides assertions by the CTC.The way they were specifically named by the minister in charge was a
pretty strong indication.
But we know he is a liar.
The CTC told us all to "hold fire" while they hobnobbed with the sameBut who ultimately came out with a vastly improved form of words, and
officials who'd doublecrossed them.
said that the "hobnobbing" with the CTC was instrumental.
But we know they are liars.
Maybe what they would like is to eliminate the sources of pressure that
cause people to come and ask them awkward questions, and retain the one
that can be quietly fobbed off in a back room somewhere.
--
David Damerell <damerell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Distortion Field!
Today is First Leicesterday, September.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- From: David Martin
- Re: CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- References:
- CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- From: Ian Jackson
- Re: CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- From: Peter Clinch
- Re: CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- From: Ian Jackson
- Re: CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- From: Peter Clinch
- CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- Prev by Date: Re: Electric bikes on steep hills.
- Next by Date: Re: Lights for children's bikes
- Previous by thread: Re: CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- Next by thread: Re: CTC - the premier campaigning uselessness for UK cyclists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|