Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Tony Raven <junk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:50:42 +0100
Alan Braggins wrote on 30/06/2007 16:50 +0100:
In article <kYCdnapFtpQm-BvbnZ2dnUVZ8tWnnZ2d@xxxxxxxxx>, Tony Raven wrote:Simon Brooke wrote on 30/06/2007 14:44 +0100:Prison is onlyYou forgot prison "pour encourager les autres.
justified in so far as it either rehabilitates the offender, or protects
the public.
Arguably that's protecting the public from those who would have committed
the crime if they weren't deterred by the thought of the prison sentence.
At least that's the intention, and if it doesn't work, I don't think
"pour encourager les autres" does justify prison.
Hypothetical. If crossing a red light carried an automatic prison sentence instead of an FPN would you be more, the same or less likely to cross a red light?
--
Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way."
- Bertrand Russell
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Nick
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- References:
- [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Tony Raven
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Tony Raven
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Alan Braggins
- [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Prev by Date: Re: Cyclecraft: Exceptions
- Next by Date: Re: Cyclecraft: Exceptions
- Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|