Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Rob Morley <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:42:42 +0100
In article <1183218081.193253.79010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
raisethe
raisethe@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
On 30 Jun, 16:20, Rob Morley <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The good thing about prolonged driving bans are that they help prevent
recidivism and that they don't cost the tax payer.
Except that banned drivers often continue to drive, repeatedly catching
them and putting them through the courts costs money, supervising their
community service costs money ...-
The error here is that they shouldn't be caught repeatedly. After
killing someone, they should be monitored carefully eg by tagging,
signing in at police stations every day etc.
Are we still talking about drivers who kill? I was just commenting on
how ineffective driving bans can be. I agree with the idea of penal
colonies though. :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Squashme
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: raisethe
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- References:
- [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Tony Raven
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: raisethe
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Nick
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: Rob Morley
- Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- From: raisethe
- [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Next by Date: Re: Cyclecraft: Exceptions
- Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Death driver jail term criticised]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|