Re: Loose bearings in integrated headsets
- From: Simon Brooke <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:21:49 +0100
in message <1182159276.705710.176370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark
('mdrayton@xxxxxxxxx') wrote:
On 18 Jun, 09:26, squeaker <mdcro...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:athttp://www.chrisking.com/tech/int_headsets_explained/int_hds_explain_...
Take a look
for how they work (and why they may not be such a good idea).
Okay, thanks. That explains what I'm seeing. And yes, they do seem to
be a bit of a crap idea :(
I'm not defending them, because I don't know enough about the
technicalities of headsets to argue the toss. But mine, which is a Cane
Creek IS2, works fine - for me, anyway.
--
simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
There are no messages. The above is just a random stream of
bytes. Any opinion or meaning you find in it is your own creation.
.
- References:
- Loose bearings in integrated headsets
- From: Mark
- Re: Loose bearings in integrated headsets
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: Loose bearings in integrated headsets
- From: Mark
- Re: Loose bearings in integrated headsets
- From: squeaker
- Re: Loose bearings in integrated headsets
- From: Mark
- Loose bearings in integrated headsets
- Prev by Date: Re: I never knew this before
- Next by Date: Re: loud bell
- Previous by thread: Re: Loose bearings in integrated headsets
- Next by thread: Good singles
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|