Re: Riding on the pavement
- From: Ambrose Nankivell <firstname+'n'@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:09:14 GMT
Alan Holmes wrote:
archierob <archierob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Whatever the circumstances they will find an excuse to circumvent the
'law'. In pursuit of a crime etc. Testing the vehicle to its limit -ie
doing 160 mph on a public highway. Shooting dead Harry Stanley because
he was in possession of a coffee table leg. It goes on and on - they
intimidate us into believing that they can break the law to protect us
and we are far to frightened to protest. When it comes to the police
we are all cowards - we dare not challenge them because we are far too
frightened to do so.
I'm not frightened of them, I ALWAYS challenge accusations of exceeding the speed limit when it is by the use of a speed camera, and, so far, each accusaton has been forgotten.
I was stupid enough to pay one, but never again.
I, however, have never been stupid enough to even get sent a bill for such fines.
--
A
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Riding on the pavement
- From: wafflycat
- Re: Riding on the pavement
- From: Alan Holmes
- Re: Riding on the pavement
- References:
- Riding on the pavement
- From: the . Mark
- Re: Riding on the pavement
- From: archierob
- Re: Riding on the pavement
- From: Ekul Namsob
- Re: Riding on the pavement
- From: Alan Holmes
- Riding on the pavement
- Prev by Date: Re: Steel & Aluminium
- Next by Date: Re: Ride TdeF for the BBC.
- Previous by thread: Re: Riding on the pavement
- Next by thread: Re: Riding on the pavement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|