Re: Cyclist hit and runs - what is the answer?

Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: 
Tony W <tonyremove@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A little consistence would be nice. 

I have no problem saying she was injured when struck by a cyclist.  None
at all.  To portray this as some kind of epidemic, as TrollB does, in
clear defiance of the previousy posted facts regarding the relative
frequency of pedestrian injuries on pavements by cars and bikes,

Here you go again, using the fact that more people are injured in collisions involving motor vehicles, and particularly /cars/, than with pedal cycles, in an attempt to sweep away the actual topic of this thread - that of the increasing problem of collisions between bikes and pedestrians.

You and your ilk are making it so much easier for the press to demand action from the government.

--
Matt B
.

Quantcast