Re: Cyclist hit and runs - what is the answer?

Tony W <tonyremove@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> A little consistence would be nice.

I have no problem saying she was injured when struck by a cyclist. None
at all. To portray this as some kind of epidemic, as TrollB does, in
clear defiance of the previousy posted facts regarding the relative
frequency of pedestrian injuries on pavements by cars and bikes, and in
order to push a car-centric "solution" to the (plainly insignificant)
"problem" is trolling, especially when you remember how many times we've
told the little git precisely /why/ the propsed solution is completely
disporportionate, and why it has been applied uniquely to motor traffic
as a response to the unique dangers posed by motor traffic.

All tis is as you'd expect given that it was TrollB whio started the
thread.

--
Guy
.

Quantcast