Re: One more and i would have hit him!!!
- From: Mike Hibbert <mike.hibbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:26:25 GMT
Blonde wrote:
'...an unlit cyclist dressed in black (male this time) brushed past me from behind as I walked and he cycled along the pavement. '
What he was wearing is unimportant but the fact he was unlit and riding
the pavement means I personally I would not call this bloke who happens
to be on a bike a 'cyclist'.
It's a shame but often people who don't cycle will see someone
exhibiting poor cycling behaviour and then feel justified in making
sweeping generalisations about all cyclists.
Yeah, you'd never get anyone in here making sweeping statements about other road users ;o)
.
- References:
- One more and i would have hit him!!!
- From: p.k.
- Re: One more and i would have hit him!!!
- From: Simon Bennett
- Re: One more and i would have hit him!!!
- From: Roos Eisma
- Re: One more and i would have hit him!!!
- From: POHB
- Re: One more and i would have hit him!!!
- From: Blonde
- One more and i would have hit him!!!
- Prev by Date: Re: Thieving abstrads!
- Next by Date: Re: Bikes on Southern trains; the jackboot goes in
- Previous by thread: Re: One more and i would have hit him!!!
- Next by thread: Re: One more and i would have hit him!!!
- Index(es):