Re: ping Guy
- From: Peter Clinch <p.j.clinch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:32:54 +0000
mark wrote:
Reading the thread in question, Mr. Clinch seems to have turned a fairly civil discussion about sun visors into what he calls a minor flame war about the H-word. Any "wrestling with pigs" caveats would therefore appear to apply to both sides of the pond.
I gave a solution to the original problem that applied with or without helmets. I was told a load of nonsesne about why only a fool wouldn't wear one, I replied with some illuminating facts delivered in a matter of fact manner, rather rude things came back at me.
There was nothing uncivil about my original post into the thread, and in replies I have asked simple questions and stated facts.
What's your problem?
/My/ problem is people pushing devices as doing more than there is any good evidence for them doing. It's a matter of public health, quite an important issue.
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.clinch@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ .
- References:
- Re: ping Guy
- From: Mike Causer
- Re: ping Guy
- From: mark
- Re: ping Guy
- Prev by Date: Re: Behold, I live and breathe
- Next by Date: Re: News from Simon Brooke
- Previous by thread: Re: ping Guy
- Next by thread: 5 (6?) killed in crash
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|