Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Tony Raven <junk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:44:37 +0100
Chris Slade wrote:
Perhaps we ought to do away with grades altogether and just use a percentage? Easier to differentiate then.
Personally I agree that is the best answer.
-- Tony
"I did make a mistake once - I thought I'd made a mistake but I hadn't" Anon
.
- References:
- O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: The Nottingham Duck
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Peewiglet
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Peter Headland
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Sniper8052
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: The Nottingham Duck
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Sniper8052
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Peter Headland
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Jon Senior
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Tony Raven
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Jon Senior
- Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- From: Chris Slade
- O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- Prev by Date: Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- Next by Date: Re: helmet letter
- Previous by thread: Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- Next by thread: Re: O.T. Annual A-Level Fiasco
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|