Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: "LSMike" <mikevanerp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:50:43 +0000 (UTC)
"MarkK" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:de2j0j$hgp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Simon Brooke" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:jdodt2-
>
>> Don't you bother to read /anything/ before replying?
>
> I do, but I misunderstood what you meant by this bit:
> "The food produced by farmers in Britain has, I believe, one twenty
> seventh
> of the calorific value of the fossil fuels burned by farmers to produce
> it,
> by hauliers to transport it, and in chemical fertilisers and pesticides
> used
> to regulate its growth."
>
> You've made it much clearer & it's a bit of an eye-opener for me, I must
> admit.
And an eye opener for me too.
.
- References:
- Greenness of cycling?
- From: LSMike
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: LSMike
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: Tosspot
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: Ian Gregory
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: Ambrose Nankivell
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: Ian Gregory
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: Tim Woodall
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: Ian Gregory
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: MarkK
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: MarkK
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: Greenness of cycling?
- From: MarkK
- Greenness of cycling?
- Prev by Date: Re: Red light running and other things on last night commute
- Next by Date: Re: Upright Trikes vs Recumbents
- Previous by thread: Re: Greenness of cycling?
- Next by thread: Re: Greenness of cycling?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|