Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:16:09 GMT, stevenj3371@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Steven)
wrote:

>Look at (c) below. It is only necessary for any one of the definitions to hold
>for the word to be valid, and (c) certainly does.
>

>
>Now, (a) Obviously applies, but is obsolete.

So that contradicts your first statement.

Either (a) applies and the word is valid, or your assertion that, "It
is only necessary for any one of the definitions to hold for the word
to be valid" is wrong.

Care to try again, this time using a consistent form logic throughout
your argument?

.

Relevant Pages