Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.
- From: "Robert" <robert@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:59:31 +0100
"Steven" <stevenj3371@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42eb5fa2.12140312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>What gets my goat is the comment, "Humberside chief crown prosecutor Nigel
>>Cowgill said the death was an "appalling" accident." There is nothing
>>'accidental' about being stuck from behind by two twunts using city
>>streets
>>as a race track, and one driver was already disqualified from driving and
>>the other hadn't even passed his test.
>
> Actually, there is.
>
> They did not set out to hit the cyclist, nor intend to do so, so it was an
> accident.
>
> The law, however, does not allow someone to escape culpability merely
> because
> something is an accident.
>
Thank you. I do wish people would stop trying to change the language.
While I think the prison sentences are appropriate. I think it is time we
introduced lifetime driving bans.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.
- From: madmarie2005-scu
- Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.
- From: Patrick Herring
- Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.
- From: Just zis Guy, you know?
- Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.
- References:
- Cyclist killers in local paper.
- From: Simon Mason
- Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.
- From: wafflycat
- Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.
- From: Steven
- Cyclist killers in local paper.
- Prev by Date: Re: Press release from Crown Prosecution Service
- Next by Date: Re: Not always the driver's fault.....
- Previous by thread: Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.
- Next by thread: Re: Cyclist killers in local paper.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|