Re: bloke didn't buy the Celsior, so I'm considering a chop in.
- From: "DervMan" <thedervman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 13:02:32 -0000
"Elder" <carl.robson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.22068d02fcfbbf8a989c11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <603bgsF1opp9tU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, douggie@xxxxxxxxxxxx
says...
Trouble is, you won't like it if other people approve of it. (c:I like Saabs, and thanks to the forums and Dervy, I know what the TiDs
can do, and what their weaknesses are and what can go wrong on them.
Little goes wrong because it is a tractor engine in a tarted vectra
shell,
Yup, pretty much. The 2.2's strengths are that it's an old, "proven"
design. Other than the mass air meter, the odd cooling / head gasket and
oil leak, they appear bullet proof.
The mass air meter tends to last ~60,000 miles and it's over £200 from Saab.
and the weakness is the bulkead but I believe that can be fixed.
Absolutely - it helps if you have one with a full service history, but the
question to ask Saab is, "what exactly is serviced on the bulkhead?" when
they query this point.
--
The DervMan
www.dervman.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: bloke didn't buy the Celsior, so I'm considering a chop in.
- Next by Date: Re: bloke didn't buy the Celsior, so I'm considering a chop in.
- Previous by thread: Re: bloke didn't buy the Celsior, so I'm considering a chop in.
- Next by thread: Re: bloke didn't buy the Celsior, so I'm considering a chop in.
- Index(es):