Re: Now it can be told
- From: Chris Thomas <chris.alex.thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:19:58 +0000
AstraVanMan wrote:
yes, I was right about what I just said, back into retard modeYou never got out of it. Onlyu a retard coyuld claim accuracy for an untested model and to give a percentage accuracy when you don't ahve a clue about what the accuracy could be is the mark of a pure bull*** artist.no, I did, you just didnt realise it until now.
"Onlyu a retard coyuld....when you don't ahvae"....
nice spelling that steve, did you goto med school? or straight into the hospital to pick up that application form for porter?
Coming from someone who, on several occasions, has criticised others for having nothing better to say that to slag off people's spelling, I refer you to your earlier comments. I'm sure you'll find them easily enough, being the godlike genius that you are.
my point is that steve claims he's amazing and knows loads more about grammer than I ever do, yet he does this, but I also note that instead of jumping all over him like you did me for making similar mistakes, you actually dump on me for pointing this out.
I detect a huge amount of bias .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Now it can be told
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Now it can be told
- From: AstraVanMan
- Re: Now it can be told
- From: SteveH
- Re: Now it can be told
- References:
- Re: Now it can be told
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Now it can be told
- From: Chris Thomas
- Re: Now it can be told
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Now it can be told
- From: Chris Thomas
- Re: Now it can be told
- From: AstraVanMan
- Re: Now it can be told
- Prev by Date: Re: Now it can be told
- Next by Date: Re: Now it can be told
- Previous by thread: Re: Now it can be told
- Next by thread: Re: Now it can be told
- Index(es):
Loading