Re: Speed camera vigilantes - shouldn't really encourage 'em, but...
- From: "andy" <dave@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:57:33 +0100
"Martin" <spamspam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dca8co$67u$2$8300dec7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Surely something that fried the electronics in the van is what's
>>>needed... :)
>
> As you casually brush past?
>
> Getting the glue in is hard enough!
>
Some sort of electro-magnetic pulse device? ;-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Speed camera vigilantes - shouldn't really encourage 'em, but...
- From: Carl Bowman
- Re: Speed camera vigilantes - shouldn't really encourage 'em, but...
- From: Martin
- Re: Speed camera vigilantes - shouldn't really encourage 'em, but...
- From: Alistair J Murray
- Re: Speed camera vigilantes - shouldn't really encourage 'em, but...
- From: Martin
- Speed camera vigilantes - shouldn't really encourage 'em, but...
- Prev by Date: Re: What's likely to be more economical
- Next by Date: Re: Speed camera vigilantes - shouldn't really encourage 'em, but...
- Previous by thread: Re: Speed camera vigilantes - shouldn't really encourage 'em, but...
- Next by thread: Re: Speed camera vigilantes - shouldn't really encourage 'em, but...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|