Re: adjustable car ramp
- From: "moray" <mtb_hyphen_rules@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:29:58 +0100
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4f0db58f6adave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <op.twljs9d1yuobwl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Duncan Wood <newsto@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Anything that uses a screw that can't turn by itself (ball screws
aren't used for this reason), does not need a secondary locking
system. And before you try arguing, at work there are three different
two post lifts (two are 3tonne rated, the other 5tonne rated) that
use screws, along with a four post lift rated at 18tonne, all of
which use screws with no secondary locking device.
Are you sure they're not driven by a braked motor?
You'd need a *very* coarse screw thread to be reversible.
That's the exact principle they rely on. Certainly all the two posters have
no form of braking, but the motors are highly geared via belts, which helps
increase resistance to the screw self running (the screws spin, and the nuts
are stationary).
Having had to lower one manually, they're not going to self-run!
The big four poster isn't braked, but again each motor is geared through a
gearbox (going by the shape/location of the gearbox, I'd suspect they're
epicyclic gearing, rather than a wormwheel and screw)
And getting back on topic, a brake on the screw/nut/drive system is not a
secondary locking device.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: adjustable car ramp
- From: Duncan Wood
- Re: adjustable car ramp
- References:
- adjustable car ramp
- From: techtalk
- Re: adjustable car ramp
- From: SimonJ
- Re: adjustable car ramp
- From: moray
- Re: adjustable car ramp
- From: Duncan Wood
- Re: adjustable car ramp
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- adjustable car ramp
- Prev by Date: Re: adjustable car ramp
- Next by Date: Re: adjustable car ramp
- Previous by thread: Re: adjustable car ramp
- Next by thread: Re: adjustable car ramp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|