Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:25:34 +0100, Malcolm Kane
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>In message <qhm8c11fsm3kn15j81r5oilfnrpurifnog@xxxxxxx>,
>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:00:39 +0100, Malcolm Kane
>><malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>In message <7e67c1lav1avjnntmf80hspjcfplpu86a6@xxxxxxx>,
>>>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:00:20 +0100, Malcolm Kane
>>>><malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In message <6to5c1lgdmr59m4gmeahmlvd1opbe1rmnd@xxxxxxx>,
>>>>>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>>>>>On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:15:11 +0100, Malcolm Kane
>>>>>><malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I know verbalising your thoughts does sometimes seem a little much for
>>>>>>>you but I asked a question for which I genuinely wanted to see your link
>>>>>>>so please put into words why you link the two.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why?
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh dear. I didn't think the concept of discussion was so hard to
>>>>>understand.
>>>>>
>>>>>It goes like this Angus. You make a point I want clarification so ask
>>>>>for it. You reply with the clarification then I reply.
>>>>>
>>>>>Simple really.
>>>>>
>>>>>So we are at the point where you have made a point. You linked rabbits
>>>>>being hit by epidemic disease with the reason foxes should be left
>>>>>alone.
>>>>
>>>>No I didn't. Read what I responded to.
>>>
>>><INSERT>
>>>Mike
>>>Rabbits are predated by several species and prone to disease epidemics.
>>>Angus
>>>Yes. That's why foxes should be left alone.
>>>
>>></INSERT>
>>>
>>>I know you won't be able to answer this and all I will get is evasion
>>>and abuse BUT here goes.
>>>
>>>Please try to explain why foxes should be left alone because rabbits are
>>>predated and prone to disease.
>>
>>Fake! That's not what you said.
>>
>>You said, "So we are at the point where you have made a point. You
>>linked rabbits being hit by epidemic disease with the reason foxes
>>should be left
>>alone."
>
>
>I am sorry Angus I hadn't allowed for your grasp of the English
>language.
>
>Firstly that post I think if you check was not my first on the subject.
>
>Secondly are you suggesting that the words above do not link rabbits and
>foxes. I would suggest "That's why foxes should be left alone"
>establishes a link.
>
>However now we have agreed on the words can you explain your point or is
>that totally beyond you as well.
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I wanted clarification of your thinking so asked.
>>>>
>>>>Work it out.
>>>
>>>I'll take that as a recognition that you feel on shaky ground and
>>>unprepared to discuss your statement> Fine if you are really prepared
>>>to admit defeat.
>>
>>You're a fake, Malcolm .
>
>Can I take that as confirmation that you feel on shaky ground or are you
>going to expand on your rather strange statement that because rabbits
>are predated and suffer disease foxes should be left alone?
>
>If not is it because there is no logic to the statement and as a result
>you can't expand.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You instead of following the normal system of answering have found all
>>>>>the reasons under the sun for not replying.
>>>>
>>>>I will not respond to stupid questions.
>>>
>>>Why is asking you to clarify your position a stupid question? Other
>>>than the fact I ought to know better than expect you to respond to
>>>things you find difficult.
>>
>>There's not much I find difficult that you come up with :-))
>
>Wonderful so you will have no problem with what I am asking. I look
>forward to your clarification.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Is it really so difficult to understand. I am trying to follow your
>>>>>train of thought and have difficulty in seeing why you link foxes and
>>>>>rabbits so asked you to expand on your thoughts. You are reluctant.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why?
>>>
>>>Because that's how discussion is carried on and how people learn. If
>>>your aren't posting to the newsgroup to try to get people to understand
>>>and hopefully convert to your position what are you posting for?
>>
>>I think you are finding this matter extremely difficult to understand.
>>Perhaps you should make provision for contemplating alternative
>>thought.
>
>
>When you give me the information I am asking for I will gladly
>contemplate it at length.
>
>So when are you going to give the information I ask for.
>
>>
>>>
>>>Why is it that every time someone wants clarification so they can
>>>understand your position you go all defensive and refuse?
>>
>>I don't.
>
>Again wonderful so I look forward to the clarification.

In what way?



Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks
    ... Rabbits are predated by several species and prone to disease epidemics. ... That's why foxes should be left alone. ...
    (uk.rec.birdwatching)
  • Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks
    ... Rabbits are predated by several species and prone to disease epidemics. ... That's why foxes should be left alone. ...
    (uk.rec.birdwatching)
  • Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks
    ... >>>Clarification of why you feel foxes should be left alone because rabbits ... >Angus I know what I think you are getting at. ... And that's a genuine question not abuse. ...
    (uk.rec.birdwatching)
  • Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks
    ... You reply with the clarification then I reply. ... >>>being hit by epidemic disease with the reason foxes should be left ... >Rabbits are predated by several species and prone to disease epidemics. ... That's why foxes should be left alone. ...
    (uk.rec.birdwatching)
  • Re: The "Boonies"
    ... from wild rabbits to foxes. ... If you're keeping the foxes alive, and keeping the rabbits alive, why ... seal hunt by spray-painting the baby seals with green paint. ...
    (misc.writing)