Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:00:39 +0100, Malcolm Kane
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>In message <7e67c1lav1avjnntmf80hspjcfplpu86a6@xxxxxxx>,
>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:00:20 +0100, Malcolm Kane
>><malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>In message <6to5c1lgdmr59m4gmeahmlvd1opbe1rmnd@xxxxxxx>,
>>>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>>>On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:15:11 +0100, Malcolm Kane
>>>><malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I know verbalising your thoughts does sometimes seem a little much for
>>>>>you but I asked a question for which I genuinely wanted to see your link
>>>>>so please put into words why you link the two.
>>>>
>>>>Why?
>>>
>>>Oh dear. I didn't think the concept of discussion was so hard to
>>>understand.
>>>
>>>It goes like this Angus. You make a point I want clarification so ask
>>>for it. You reply with the clarification then I reply.
>>>
>>>Simple really.
>>>
>>>So we are at the point where you have made a point. You linked rabbits
>>>being hit by epidemic disease with the reason foxes should be left
>>>alone.
>>
>>No I didn't. Read what I responded to.
>
><INSERT>
>Mike
>Rabbits are predated by several species and prone to disease epidemics.
>Angus
>Yes. That's why foxes should be left alone.
>
></INSERT>
>
>I know you won't be able to answer this and all I will get is evasion
>and abuse BUT here goes.
>
>Please try to explain why foxes should be left alone because rabbits are
>predated and prone to disease.

Fake! That's not what you said.

You said, "So we are at the point where you have made a point. You
linked rabbits being hit by epidemic disease with the reason foxes
should be left
alone."


>
>>
>>>
>>>I wanted clarification of your thinking so asked.
>>
>>Work it out.
>
>I'll take that as a recognition that you feel on shaky ground and
>unprepared to discuss your statement> Fine if you are really prepared
>to admit defeat.

You're a fake, Malcolm .


>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>You instead of following the normal system of answering have found all
>>>the reasons under the sun for not replying.
>>
>>I will not respond to stupid questions.
>
>Why is asking you to clarify your position a stupid question? Other
>than the fact I ought to know better than expect you to respond to
>things you find difficult.

There's not much I find difficult that you come up with :-))



>
>>
>>>
>>>Is it really so difficult to understand. I am trying to follow your
>>>train of thought and have difficulty in seeing why you link foxes and
>>>rabbits so asked you to expand on your thoughts. You are reluctant.
>>>
>>>Why?
>
>Because that's how discussion is carried on and how people learn. If
>your aren't posting to the newsgroup to try to get people to understand
>and hopefully convert to your position what are you posting for?

I think you are finding this matter extremely difficult to understand.
Perhaps you should make provision for contemplating alternative
thought.

>
>Why is it that every time someone wants clarification so they can
>understand your position you go all defensive and refuse?

I don't.




Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The "Boonies"
    ... from wild rabbits to foxes. ... If you're keeping the foxes alive, and keeping the rabbits alive, why ... seal hunt by spray-painting the baby seals with green paint. ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks
    ... Rabbits are predated by several species and prone to disease epidemics. ... That's why foxes should be left alone. ...
    (uk.rec.birdwatching)
  • Re: The "Boonies"
    ... from wild rabbits to foxes. ... If you're keeping the foxes alive, and keeping the rabbits alive, why ... to harrass the hawks. ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks
    ... >>>Rabbits are predated by several species and prone to disease epidemics. ... That's why foxes should be left alone. ... >I am sorry Angus I hadn't allowed for your grasp of the English ...
    (uk.rec.birdwatching)