Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:00:20 +0100, Malcolm Kane
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>In message <6to5c1lgdmr59m4gmeahmlvd1opbe1rmnd@xxxxxxx>,
>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:15:11 +0100, Malcolm Kane
>><malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>I know verbalising your thoughts does sometimes seem a little much for
>>>you but I asked a question for which I genuinely wanted to see your link
>>>so please put into words why you link the two.
>>
>>Why?
>
>Oh dear. I didn't think the concept of discussion was so hard to
>understand.
>
>It goes like this Angus. You make a point I want clarification so ask
>for it. You reply with the clarification then I reply.
>
>Simple really.
>
>So we are at the point where you have made a point. You linked rabbits
>being hit by epidemic disease with the reason foxes should be left
>alone.

No I didn't. Read what I responded to.

>
>I wanted clarification of your thinking so asked.

Work it out.


>
>You instead of following the normal system of answering have found all
>the reasons under the sun for not replying.

I will not respond to stupid questions.

>
>Is it really so difficult to understand. I am trying to follow your
>train of thought and have difficulty in seeing why you link foxes and
>rabbits so asked you to expand on your thoughts. You are reluctant.
>
>Why?


See above.




Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks
    ... You make a point I want clarification so ask for it. ... You linked rabbits being hit by epidemic disease with the reason foxes should be left alone. ... You instead of following the normal system of answering have found all the reasons under the sun for not replying. ...
    (uk.rec.birdwatching)
  • Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks
    ... >>>Again wonderful so I look forward to the clarification. ... Angus Macmillan ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.birdwatching)