Re: Protecting our moorhen chicks

In message <6to5c1lgdmr59m4gmeahmlvd1opbe1rmnd@xxxxxxx>, amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes 
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:15:11 +0100, Malcolm Kane
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I know verbalising your thoughts does sometimes seem a little much for
you but I asked a question for which I genuinely wanted to see your link
so please put into words why you link the two.

Why?

Oh dear. I didn't think the concept of discussion was so hard to understand.

It goes like this Angus. You make a point I want clarification so ask for it. You reply with the clarification then I reply.

Simple really.

So we are at the point where you have made a point. You linked rabbits being hit by epidemic disease with the reason foxes should be left alone.

I wanted clarification of your thinking so asked.

You instead of following the normal system of answering have found all the reasons under the sun for not replying.

Is it really so difficult to understand. I am trying to follow your train of thought and have difficulty in seeing why you link foxes and rabbits so asked you to expand on your thoughts. You are reluctant.

Why?
--
Malcolm Kane
.