Re: hd radio
- From: "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:24:09 +0100
In article <h8tnov$7vd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Keith G <ksg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I also enjoy the BBC4 TV versions.[1] They do have slightly level
compressed sound compared to R3, but usually not enough to bother me.
Once again I'm tempted to say the 'horns' appear to help enormously with
'compressed' sound (within sensible limits - excludes 'pop)..??
Any explanation for this? It doesn't make any sense. Of course if you use
a very 'low-fi' system, that will tend to mask some things. But I doubt
that's what you mean?
--
*A nest isn't empty until all their stuff is out of the attic
Dave Plowman dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
.
- References:
- hd radio
- From: Brian Gaff
- Re: hd radio
- From: David Looser
- Re: hd radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: hd radio
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: hd radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: hd radio
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: hd radio
- From: Keith G
- Re: hd radio
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: hd radio
- From: Keith G
- Re: hd radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: hd radio
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: hd radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: hd radio
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: hd radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: hd radio
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: hd radio
- From: David Looser
- Re: hd radio
- From: Keith G
- Re: hd radio
- From: Jim Lesurf
- Re: hd radio
- From: Keith G
- Re: hd radio
- From: Jim Lesurf
- Re: hd radio
- From: Keith G
- hd radio
- Prev by Date: Re: Nostalgia for British Rail?
- Next by Date: Re: hd radio
- Previous by thread: Re: hd radio
- Next by thread: Re: hd radio
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|