Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:48:53 +0100
Don Pearce wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Ian Iveson wrote:
Nick Gorham wrote
If the electrical potential is not sufficient to accelerate them to
required velocity, the anode will get hot, but not emit x-rays.
I'll go along with that, more or less.
Current is equally important.
No it isn't.
Current is irrelevant to the mechanism of X-ray production.
Come on chaps, you are arguing about two different things - the
electron energy needed to generate electrons at all, and the total
energy generated by a beam of electrons (of sufficient individual h *
nu type energy). Beam current determines the power of the x-ray beam
generated, and hence the energy in that beam.
I know but Iveson has it upside down. Of course current determines the ultimate
power but there's no 'current threshold' for X-ray production.
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Don Pearce
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- References:
- 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Nick Gorham
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Phil Allison
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Nick Gorham
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Don Pearce
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Phil Allison
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Eeyore
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Ian Iveson
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Nick Gorham
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Ian Iveson
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Eeyore
- Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- From: Don Pearce
- 300b/GM70 Amp
- Prev by Date: Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- Next by Date: Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- Previous by thread: Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- Next by thread: Re: 300b/GM70 Amp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|