Re: from another forum anyone any idea whats broke ?


"Don Pearce" <donald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:445085c9.23186046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:53:40 +0100, "Keith G" <keith_g@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


Some people reckon the Denon to be a bit soggy - I can't see it? I liked
it
(busted now) but neither Swim nor Shiny Nigel liked it very much...???


No - sure the volume from the Denon was down quite a lot on the Shure
- that could be it. And it is just a touch hummy as well, but I would
say if anything the Shure has just a bit too much mid range - a bit
more presence, you might say. Obviously I don't know how that record
is meant to sound,


??

It sounds like you hear it, if you ain't got a copy to compare!!


so it could be the Shure that is right, and the
Denon wrong.


Yes, once I've got the tracks down I don't much care what went into
producing them. Anything not too good can be done again. Another rummage
(there's a ton of stuff I want to hear for myself) turned up the album this
little gem comes from:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/cheery%20song.mp3

A cheery little number! :-)

Trust me, it takes real talent to play this laid back!!

I wonder if anyone has any idea who it is? (Not *that* obscure!)





.