Re: Northern Rail cancellations
- From: "John Salmon" <ihmfdrtl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:37:31 -0000
"Charlie Hulme" wrote
Mr.G wrote:Paul quoted:
<175s were used by First North Western on some services on that line. Then there was the top-n-tailed 31s...
Why are your quotes the wrong way round? Many newsreaders (including
my ancient copy of Agent) put lines starting with '>' in a different
colour to distinguish them as a quote. You appear to be deliberately
mixing '>' and '<', making your posts difficult to read.
He's using Gmail (according to the nice Thunderbird 'Display User Agent' add-on) - but then so are others who post quite normally, so who knows?
He also has an eccentric habit of repeating part of the previous poster's message; it was one of those that had the quotes the wrong way round - in fact you posted that bit originally, and for some unknown reason he copied it within his reply.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Northern Rail cancellations
- From: Mr . G
- Re: Northern Rail cancellations
- References:
- Re: Northern Rail cancellations
- From: Mr . G
- Re: Northern Rail cancellations
- From: Charlie Hulme
- Re: Northern Rail cancellations
- Prev by Date: Re: New MKC departure board
- Next by Date: 3 Train Drivers to Sue Employer for Industrial Injury
- Previous by thread: Re: Northern Rail cancellations
- Next by thread: Re: Northern Rail cancellations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|