Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: "MB" <mb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:45:17 +0100
"Chris Tolley" <cj.tolley@xxxxxxxxxxx (ukonline really)> wrote in message
news:3bg9h3xjks0g$.90mm2m7vjex4$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Arthur Figgis wrote:
Chris Tolley wrote:
Arthur Figgis wrote:
Chris Tolley wrote:The "first they came for ..." quote is about a progression of people
Arthur Figgis wrote:<munch>
Chris Tolley wrote:
being taken away and incarcerated by the same group of people. None of
the things you have cited, distressing/inconvenient/horrible though
they
may be, fits into that pattern. So far, _nobody has done the first
step_
in this country. Unless you know something I don't there are no
concentration camps populated by railfan-photographers.
No-one is claiming there is.
Well, if it hasn't happened, and nobody is claiming that it has
happened, then obviously whatever people have been talking about is of a
significantly lesser degree, which seems to be the point I have been
making all along. QED.
But many completely innocent people have been "taken away" to be
fingerprinted, photographed and DNA sampled on the slimmest of excuses.
Many of these have been held in custody for periods without any
justification and suspiciously like being done to teach them a lesson in
full knowledge that they have not committed any offence and not going to be
charged with an offence.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- References:
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: MB
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: MB
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Charles Ellson
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Roland Perry
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Charles Ellson
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: MB
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Stephen Furley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- Prev by Date: Re: Metrolink Matters - First M5000 tram delivered
- Next by Date: Re: Metrolink Matters - First M5000 tram delivered
- Previous by thread: Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- Next by thread: Re: Slightly-OT: Met Police issue photography advice
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|