Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Charlie Hulme <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:43:38 +0100
Tony Polson wrote:
My favoured solution would be to re-let rail franchises as concessions,
with a Railways Agency setting the timetables, fares and standards of
service (including catering) and choosing the rolling stock, then
offering concessions to companies in the same way as London Buses does.
There would be standard liveries with the concessionaires' logos being
kept subtle. Ticketing would be as fully integrated and interavailable
as it was under BR.
Strangely enough, that's also my view, and also apparently that of the Scottish Government. An unlikely trio ;-)
Charlie
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Tony Polson
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Sam Wilson
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- References:
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Roland Perry
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: D1039
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Tony Polson
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: D1039
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Tony Polson
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Tony Miles
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Tony Polson
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Tony Miles
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Recliner
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- From: Tony Polson
- Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Southern DaySave valid on the Gatwick Express?
- Next by Date: Re: The first thing we do - Cross default risk - C2C etc.
- Previous by thread: Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- Next by thread: Re: Could NatEx hang on to ECML?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading