Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- From: Tony Polson <docnews2011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:13:16 +0100
Arthur Figgis <afiggis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
allan tracy wrote:
No-one really wanted to be first with ETCS, but once someone else has it
fully up and running and has paid the costs of ironing out the bugs then
they'll buy it. People often prefer not to buy version 1.0 of things.
You mean like the hybrid IEP.
I can't imagine many people queuing up to buy them - much of Europe has
electrified its inter-city routes already (presumably SBB never asked
Polson for advice).
No need, because Switzerland had plenty of cheap, clean
hydro-electricity and didn't need to build new and filthy coal fired
power stations to fill a yawning gap in electricity supply versus
demand.
.
- References:
- Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- From: Jonathan Morton
- Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- From: Tony
- Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- From: Railsigns.co.uk
- Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- From: Tony
- Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- From: David Hansen
- Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- Prev by Date: Re: Voyager Accident?
- Next by Date: Re: Quite Where Will GW Electrification Leave The Bits Not Plugged In?
- Previous by thread: Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- Next by thread: Re: Virgin trains to travel at up to 135mph?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading