Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: TimB <timburford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 25, 6:08 pm, rail <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <376deb37-a022-4768-a7b6-6f9af4616...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
TimB <timburf...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 25, 5:17 pm, rail <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <h200f6$e...@xxxxxxxx>
Alistair Gunn <palmerspe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rail twisted the electrons to say:
Actually I'm not argueing against cycling being a good form of
exercise and beneficial to one's health. But then I'm not the one
complaining that cycle lanes are far too dangerous to use and are a
breach of cyclists humqn rights.
Is anybody claiming "human rights"?
Oh dear, a literalist with no discenable sense of humour
As for too dangerous, take a look at the Warrington Cycle Campaign's
facility of the Month webpage and see if you'd be happy to use those?
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.meg/wcc/facility-of-the-month/index...
Those? I can only see one.
There's one a month, as the name implies - just keep clicking the Back
button, or go to the archive at the foot of that page. But a sense of
humour is required.
You sent me a link to a particular photograph of a parking bay and asked if
I'd be happy to use it, how am I supposed to know you are referring to
something on a completely different page/s?
--
Graeme Wall
This address not read, substitute trains for rail
Transport Miscellany at <www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail>
a) not me (maybe Alistair?)
b) the word 'those' is plural - < As for too dangerous, take a look at
the Warrington Cycle Campaign's facility of the Month webpage and see if
you'd be happy to use those? >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: rail
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- References:
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: Robert
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: Peter Symonds
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: David Hansen
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: rail
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: mcp
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: rail
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: Alistair Gunn
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: rail
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: TimB
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: rail
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: TimB
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: rail
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: TimB
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: rail
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: Alistair Gunn
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: rail
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: TimB
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- From: rail
- Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- Prev by Date: Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- Next by Date: Re: Bletchley - Bedford rolling stock
- Previous by thread: Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- Next by thread: Re: Rail accident inquests to be held
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|