Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- From: Ross <junk.trap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 00:07:34 +0100
On Mon, 19 May 2008 06:43:05 -0700 (PDT), MIG wrote in
<16f71f32-b85e-46a8-adce-3e628cdb00ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
seen in uk.railway:
On 19 May, 01:06, Ross <junk.t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 17:06:15 GMT, Neil Williams wrote in
<48306187.1605...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, seen in uk.railway:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:45:02 -0700 (PDT), MIG
<googles...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fare dodgers' lives are made easy by the system of penalty fares,
whereby they occasionally get charged =A320 when they should be
prosecuted (if they are challenged at all, unlike softer targets).
The idea of penalty fares[1], done properly, is that the person who
gets caught one day in 7 (say) should pay slightly more than 7 times
the fare on that occasion.
No. It should be significantly higher than that; roughly 20 times the
average fare for a local journey/one zone seems to be the norm
elsewhere.
Viz the German practice of charging EUR 40 when the average 1 zone
fare is roughly EUR 2, and the Swiss charging CHF 80 with one zone
fares in the CHF 3-4 range.
The idea of (properly implemented) Penalty Fares is that they should
hurt enough that people aren't willing to take the risk of being
caught and just pay the correct fare by default.
The Swiss go further to make their PFs hurt: if you can't pay the CHF
80 Penalty Fare on the spot, they add admin charges - I didn't pay too
much attention to the exact amount the lass I saw being PFd on a
Thurbo train was quoted (being more surprised that my gripping
instincts still work almost 10 years after I stopped gripping full
time), but I think it was in the region of CHF 120.
That's 60 quid for not bothering to buy a ticket before travelling. I
think that'd make anyone think twice!
Yes, but that's effectively a fine, which should be issued by a court
after a prosecution, and might as well be much higher. (Guilty till
proven innocent, punishment before trial and all that.)
The rest of Europe doesn't seem to agree with you there, and they
generally don't have any more efficient ticket sales options than we
do (for all people like to pretend otherwise).
FWIW, if you refuse to pay in Switzerland and end up in court, the
costs involved get *much* higher, and they get imposed over and above
any fine.
And also, the definition of "bother" needs to be clear. Stand how
long in a queue exactly? Miss the connection at the interchange when
the local station office was closed? Go to what lengths to get coins
when the machine won't take notes or cards? And so on.
The definition in Switzerland is, it seems, very clear: you buy before
you get on the train/tram/bus, end of story. No "reasons" or "excuses"
accepted. No "permit to travel" machines there , either.
In this country such a definition would cause screams of anguish and
claims that society would collapse, but it doesn't seem to have had
such an effect there.
--
Ross.
* Opinions are my own; my employer has disowned me again.
* Reply-to will bounce. Replace the junk-trap with my first name to e-mail me.
AD: <http://www.merciacharters.co.uk> for rail enthusiast tours in Europe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- From: MIG
- Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- From: Neil Williams
- Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- References:
- Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- From: Axlegrease
- Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- From: MIG
- Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- From: Neil Williams
- Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- From: Ross
- Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- From: MIG
- Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- Prev by Date: Re: National Fares Manual 99
- Next by Date: Re: New Upper Quadrant Signals
- Previous by thread: Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- Next by thread: Re: Fare Dodgers' Paradise?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading