Re: To what lengths will you go to avoid poor quality rolling stock?
- From: John B <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 02:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
On 2 May, 09:31, "A.C.P.Crawshaw" <iss...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
According to Passenger Focus's Autumn 2007 survey on "the comfort of
the seating area":
FGW 64%; GNER 73%; MML 78%; VXC 78%; VWC 77%.
What's your explanation for the Pendos and Voyagers being the most
popular stock, then?
It's not possible draw that conclusion from those statistics, as FGW, GNER and MML
operate a mixture of stock.
The FGW statistic is meaningless in the context, you're right. The
GNER statistic isn't: its trains were internally identical except for
a couple of unrefurbed HSTs, which wouldn't be capable on their own of
materially swaying the totals either way.
For MML, the fleet is split evenly between 222s and more-or-less
unrefurbed HSTs. If we assume that the 222s are at least as popular as
the 220s/221s, which would be a sensible assumption to make, then its
HSTs are no more popular than the Virgin fleet.
--
John Band
john at johnband dot org
www.johnband.org
.
- References:
- To what lengths will you go to avoid poor quality rolling stock?
- From: EE507
- Re: To what lengths will you go to avoid poor quality rolling stock?
- From: John B
- Re: To what lengths will you go to avoid poor quality rolling stock?
- From: EE507
- Re: To what lengths will you go to avoid poor quality rolling stock?
- From: John B
- Re: To what lengths will you go to avoid poor quality rolling stock?
- From: A.C.P.Crawshaw
- To what lengths will you go to avoid poor quality rolling stock?
- Prev by Date: Re: ECML works and Grand Central - June 14/15
- Next by Date: Re: First WSMR service 55min late
- Previous by thread: Re: To what lengths will you go to avoid poor quality rolling stock?
- Next by thread: Re: To what lengths will you go to avoid poor quality rolling stock?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
