Re: Liverpool Docks rail link - Olive Mount Chord approved
- From: The Good Doctor <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:23:58 +0000
"BH Williams" <bhwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"tony sayer" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:so84EoBhJGKHFwwn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <x--dnYftr4v-_bXaRVnyjQA@xxxxxx>, Paul RiggAnything to do with building/civil engineering seems to be expensive in this
<g0tvb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> scribeth thus
300yds long, and as far as i know the formation is still there =
£7,600,000!
Is there anyone else out there that thinks that this is a teeny bit on
the
expensive side.
Anything to do with rail build is always expensive!./.
--
Tony Sayer
country. Mind you, they'll have had to factor in the cost of a heavy 24/7
security presence, otherwise the track will be going for a walk every
night...
The best way would be to electrify it at 25kV. Install OHLE and earth
it. Put 25kV through the rails instead.
Result: no more thefts, after one failed attempt.
Zzzzzt! BANG!
.
- References:
- Liverpool Docks rail link - Olive Mount Chord approved
- From: Dave Sallery
- Re: Liverpool Docks rail link - Olive Mount Chord approved
- From: Paul Rigg
- Re: Liverpool Docks rail link - Olive Mount Chord approved
- From: tony sayer
- Re: Liverpool Docks rail link - Olive Mount Chord approved
- From: BH Williams
- Liverpool Docks rail link - Olive Mount Chord approved
- Prev by Date: Re: Manchester Piccadily Metro Crossover.
- Next by Date: Re: Corby
- Previous by thread: Re: Liverpool Docks rail link - Olive Mount Chord approved
- Next by thread: Re: Liverpool Docks rail link - Olive Mount Chord approved
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|