Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Peter Abraham <apeterabraham@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:00:50 +0200
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:34:11 +0100, Sam Wilson <Sam.Wilson@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <JKCLMC.9B0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Charles Lindsey" <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In <4o8283h7mk3mtvn59hrrg075uo623gpatb@xxxxxxx> Christopher A.Lee
<calee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:29:20 +0100, "Richard Hunt"
<rhunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It surprises me that noone ever developed a Garrat with a driving cab
at either end.
They need more than basic communication. For instance both kept an eye
out for the signals and called out the indications to each other.
As a matter of interest, and changing the subject slightly, where in the
UK or elsewhere would you find (or have found) a turntable big enough to
turn a Garrat. Or did they always rely on loops or triangles?
Why would you need to turn a Garratt?
Sam
They were not turned at Bristol ( or not often, they used the Dr Days
Triangle sometimes).
.
- References:
- Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Andrew Robert Breen
- Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Peter Abraham
- Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Andrew Clarke
- Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Andrew Robert Breen
- Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Christopher A . Lee
- Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Richard Hunt
- Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Christopher A . Lee
- Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Charles Lindsey
- Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- From: Sam Wilson
- Steam Locomotives and Curves
- Prev by Date: Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- Next by Date: Re: ECML Draft RUS
- Previous by thread: Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- Next by thread: Re: Steam Locomotives and Curves
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|