Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: "Andy H" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:21:06 +0100
<kevallsop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1182591860.255956.274550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 23 Jun, 10:30, "Andy H" <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is no prohibition!
So are you saying that the statement by Ross Hamilton in an earlier
post, that: "Vacuum-braked single-railcars are not permitted on the
Stourbridge Town Car. Full Stop" is incorrect? (Admittedly a pretty
academic prohibition if it does exist).
Yes I did say that in an earlier post. It was a decision taken by Regional
Railways as an internal precaution. Further the new ROGS change the whole
playing field on rules and regulations and are very much based on a risk
approach hence my previous (admittedly brief if you were doing it for real)
debate about the risks and mitigation.
Andyh
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: Ross-a-travelling
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- References:
- PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: tonymiles
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: Michael Bell
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: Andy H
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: Ross-a-travelling
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: D7666
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: kevallsop
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: Andy H
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: kevallsop
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: Andy H
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: kevallsop
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: Andy H
- Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- From: kevallsop
- PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- Prev by Date: Re: EWS und DB
- Next by Date: Re: Bridge bash - by train
- Previous by thread: Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- Next by thread: Re: PPM for Stourbridge Branch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|