Re: Length of announcements
- From: Ian <ian.groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:15:13 -0700
On 10 Jun, 12:27, Arthur Figgis <afig...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Because so many of the announcements are content-free, and people begin
to subconsciously ignore them.
So no problem then?
Being told that "this train is for
Portsmouth Harbour" at every stop from Chichester to East Croydon (sic)
soon leads to my brain trying to filter out the announcements as
annoying background noise, like mobile phone conversations.
So because /you/ heard it in London, you reckon nobody else should
hear it when they get on?
Ian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Length of announcements
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Re: Length of announcements
- References:
- Length of announcements
- From: Pete Fenelon
- Re: Length of announcements
- From: Jack Taylor
- Re: Length of announcements
- From: Graham Murray
- Re: Length of announcements
- From: Mojo
- Re: Length of announcements
- From: Chris Tolley
- Re: Length of announcements
- From: Arthur Figgis
- Length of announcements
- Prev by Date: Re: 4x4 drivers targeted in north London parking rethink
- Next by Date: Re: A couple of questions about buying Rovers
- Previous by thread: Re: Length of announcements
- Next by thread: Re: Length of announcements
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|