Re: "Ding Ding" and away
- From: "Martin Underwood" <a@b>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:53:06 +0100
David Hansen wrote in message
7ck1331o9c1p8qg8scfs9fa028ah40atcp@xxxxxxx:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:01:51 +0100 someone who may be Graham Murray
<newspost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote this:-
"Martin Underwood" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Especially for something that is not time-critical like setting off
from a station, where there is no requiment to comply with the
instruction as a matter of time-critical urgency.
But in my experience, the few times I have seen it happen, when the
guard gives a single ding after the train has set off, but is still
in the platform, the train has stopped pretty smartish (often quite
abruptly as though the driver has just thrown into 'emergency' rather
than a smooth stop)
Martin was referring to a "ding-ding" not a "ding".
Indeed I was. A single ding is an emergency: if the train has just set off,
it means that someone is half in and half out of the train or a slam door
has come open. THe driver needs to act first, and acknowledge after.
Responding to ding ding is not urgent: it doesn't matter if the train sets
off now or in 5 seconds' time, so there's time to acknowledge first.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Ding Ding" and away
- From: Mojo
- Re: "Ding Ding" and away
- References:
- "Ding Ding" and away
- From: puffernutter
- Re: "Ding Ding" and away
- From: Mike Civil
- Re: "Ding Ding" and away
- From: Martin Underwood
- Re: "Ding Ding" and away
- From: Graham Murray
- Re: "Ding Ding" and away
- From: David Hansen
- "Ding Ding" and away
- Prev by Date: Re: Portsmouth FC proposed new stadium by Harbour station
- Next by Date: Re: Whats the traction package in a 319?
- Previous by thread: Re: "Ding Ding" and away
- Next by thread: Re: "Ding Ding" and away
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|