Re: "All aboard for rail service"
- From: Sue McNaughton <Sue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:03:01 +0100
In article <1154317009.660305.84640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kevallsop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes
Sue McNaughton wrote:True. But making something compulsory doesn't necessarily mean it will be done efficiently.
Same thing happened a few years back when Uppark went
up - this time it was West Sussex calling in, and Surrey and Hampshire
doing their stuff. It can be done.
IIRC, so far as fire services are concerned it isn't so much a matter
of 'can be done' as 'has to be done' because they are under a legal
obligation to have a liason arrangement with neighbouring services.
--
Sue
The Sir Nigel Gresley Locomotive Preservation Trust is now at
http://www.sirnigelgresley.co.uk
Including - 00 gauge Hornby and Bachmann models for sale.
.
- References:
- Re: "All aboard for rail service"
- From: kevallsop
- Re: "All aboard for rail service"
- Prev by Date: Re: ORR's decision upheld in East Coast case
- Next by Date: Re: ORR's decision upheld in East Coast case
- Previous by thread: Re: "All aboard for rail service"
- Next by thread: Another TPX unit goes south
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|