Re: MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- From: "Chippy" <kev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Dec 2005 12:44:47 -0800
Peter Masson wrote:
> There's another option, which I think has a lot to commend it. Build a
> single fleet of electric trains, plus a small fleet of diesel locos to drag
> them over non-electrified lines (including North of Edinburgh). While
> dragging Pendos to Holyhead has not been a conspicuous success, the theory
> is, I am convinced, still sound. Saves running diesels best part of 400
> miles under the wires, and saves having two separate trainset fleets.
The absolute cut-price option would be two HST powercars, coupled
back-to-back. Although old, they would be up to this job for some
years.
It would keep the trainspotters happy, and has a nice historical
connection - the original HST plan envisaged using the powercars in
this way on sleeper trains.
.
- References:
- MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- From: Mark Wallace
- Re: MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- From: allan tracy
- Re: MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- From: jonporter1052
- Re: MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- From: allan tracy
- Re: MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- From: jonporter1052
- Re: MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- From: Chippy
- Re: MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- From: Peter Masson
- MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- Prev by Date: Re: Another silly question
- Next by Date: Re: Daily Telegraph: Children thrown off train despite father's mobile phone pleas
- Previous by thread: Re: MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- Next by thread: Re: MML HST's to be stood down - per RAIL magazine
- Index(es):