Re: Windfarms and railways - blade hazard?
- From: "M. J. Powell" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:51:23 +0100
In message <313030303337333343170A7F58@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Jackson <dijackson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
The message <df6g6u$flv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "John Turner" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> contains these words:
If they don't work why would the promoters be willing to spend millions on such a development?
The local view of the "development" (I'm just as affected as Steve, BTW) is "money talks". The landowner gets payments of rent for the use of the land, the developer gets government and EU grants, and then payment for any electricity the windmills actually manage to produce.
At an extortionate rate, well over 24p/unit by now.
Mike -- M.J.Powell .
- References:
- Re: Windfarms and railways - blade hazard?
- From: John Turner
- Re: Windfarms and railways - blade hazard?
- Prev by Date: Re: Finally! (An Ode To The HSTs With Newer Engines)
- Next by Date: Re: First Scotrail (Trainline)
- Previous by thread: Re: Windfarms and railways - blade hazard?
- Next by thread: Re: Windfarms and railways - blade hazard?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|